Social Development for Communities (SDC) Foundation
Donate Now

Public health expenditure by Uttarakhand

SDC Foundation
August 25, 2021 |

Did you know Uttarakhand spends the least on public health amongst all the Himalayan states?

Our state’s percent of total revenue expenditure, percent of GSDP and per capita expenditure on public health remains the lowest.

In a recent release of a two-part series of factsheets on public health expenditure in Uttarakhand, SDC highlighted the poor performance of the state in terms of public health expenditure. We took into account three vital parameters to review the performance of the state in terms of public health expenditure:

  • Percent of total revenue expenditure on public health
  • Percent of GSDP being spent on public health
  • Per capita expenditure on public health

We further compared these three parameters with those of the other Himalayan states including J&K, Himachal Pradesh and Northeast (excluding Assam). Uttarakhand remains at the bottom of the expenditure tally in all the three parameters, meaning it spent the least amount of money on public health compared to J&K, Himachal Pradesh and Northeast. The data was collected from Reserve Bank of India’s Report on State of Finances 2019 and 2020.

Amongst the Himalayan states, Uttarakhand had the lowest percent of total revenue budget expenditure on public health at 6.8% compared to J&K (7.7%), Northeast (7.5%) and neighbouring Himachal Pradesh (7.6%). Uttarakhand also spends the lowest percent of GSDP on public health i.e., 1.1% compared to J&K (2.9%), Himachal Pradesh (1.8%) and Northeast (2.9%).

Uttarakhand has made the least per capita public health expenditure amongst all the Himalayan states from 2017 to 2019. Arunachal Pradesh spends the most on public health (per capita wise). The state has spent Rs. 28417 in three years compared to Rs. 5887 by Uttarakhand. Moreover, in these three years (2017-19), even the neighbouring Himachal Pradesh has spent double the amount of Uttarakhand.

“Data clearly shows that we are lagging behind. Public health has not been a key priority for the state. It is after the pandemic that discussions on public health became mainstreamed. Keeping in mind our tough conditions, it is imperative for state to invest and create robust public health system. Himachal is number one example for us. There is lot of work which needs to be done on the health front”, says SDC Founder Anoop Nautiyal.

The research by SDC has also revealed that Uttarakhand remains a poor performer in terms of utilization of National Health Mission funds, a key central policy to streamline the health-related works at the state level. As per the state’s draft health policy of 2020, from 2009 to 2016, Uttarakhand has struggled to utilize even 70% NHM funds. In 2013, we utilized only 48% funds. Though, in 2017 and 2018, state was able to utilize close to 90% funds. As per Union Health Ministry, performance of states like Uttarakhand and Bihar is worrying in terms of fund utilization.

“This is now a universal truth. States that invest more in public health will be able to ensure a safe and sustained growth. Unfortunately for Uttarakhand, scenario has been totally opposite. Our research shows that we are lagging behind on most of the key parameters of the public health expenditure. It is time for the government to look closely at these figures and engage with experts to improve its performance”, says Rishabh Shrivastava, Lead – Research and Communications, SDC.

Banner Image: Travel See Write

crossmenuchevron-down